On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:31:36 -0400
Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 09/17/2013 11:17 AM, Karel Piwko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I went once again through
>
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/2013-June/002901.html - which
> says that Sender API should be fire&forget. It feels more like "maybe
> fire"&forget, for instance it does not say that your credentials were
wrong
> - or it says, you need parse logs to get that information.
>
> If I think about Android, iOS, JS solutions to communicate with
> UnifiedPush we provide - Pipes - they always provide a callback to be
> executed on success/failure. Could we add callback to Sender API? Or should
> not Aerogear rather have something like Pipes abstraction for Java
> developers instead of pretty dumb Sender API?
>
> Thoughts?
In a bit of crazy land perhaps the client could keep a web socket or BSD
Socket open to the server which would let it get callbacks about things
that happen further down the tree.
Isn't this land called vert.x?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Karel
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev