6:25 a.m.
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Sounds good.
Let me know if you need any help with the mockup designs. ;)
Sure, I will ASAP submit a "raw" mockup on which you can work on.
What I would like is a dedicated page for the "Compose Push Message"
feature.
We wil have a criteria section to choose to who we want to send the
message. I really like for instance how Jira do that like here
http://postimg.org/image/5ur2j9wh5/
In our case we could have the drop downs for : "Variants", "Device
Type",
"Alias" and "Categories"
And then below w will have a free text area to send a custom value.
Hylke
On 23/02/2014 12:08, Sebastien Blanc wrote:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> over the weekend I spoke w/ a friend: His company is doing some mobile
> (iOS/Android) apps which also support receiving push notifications.
>
> Two examples he told me. After receiving push notification:
>
> * One of their apps basically fetches the latest version of a CSV file,
> stored on a public HTTP Server.
>
> * Another app is used to tell sales guys new brochure files (PDF) are
> available on a protected resource of a webserver (which they _can_ than
> download from w/in the app, if the like to)
>
> The company build a simple console (PHP) which allows them to send new
> push messages, when ever their customers want to.
>
> I showed them our UnifiedPush Server and its usage via our AeroDoc
> example (iOS / backend). They really liked the UnifiedPush Server.
> Especially that it does store all the device metadata.
>
> But since a lot of their mobile apps don't have a backend requirement,
> they would still have to use their own console (which than connects to UPS)
> for submitting all the push messages they want.
>
>
>
> This brings me to [AGPUSH-38] and I really think we should implement
> that feature. Not only for sending test messages! If our UnifiedPush Server
> allows its users to simple send push messages to all of their mobile apps,
> it would make the server even more attractive.
>
> I regret a bit that I was against [AGPUSH-38] in the beginning, I guess
> that's due to my Java enterprise background, where you typically find
> complex setups, and server talk to servers :-(
>
> Anyways, now I really think that the UPS has to have such a 'send push'
> facility inside of the Admin UI :-) I believe that we could reach way more
> potential users with something like that
>
+9001 and I already started thinking about this for a while. I will try to
submit some mockups/POCs this week so we can discuss that and I have
quickly a first working version on master.
> Any thoughts?
>
>
> Greetings,
> Matthias
>
>
> [AGPUSH-38] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-38
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing
listaerogear-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev