On Feb 26, 2013, at 6:56 AM, Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> These are all good thoughts. I was basically just implementing this far enough to get
your example working so there is still a lot missing. Other comments in line.
>
> On Feb 26, 2013, at 1:59 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Nice,
>>
>> a few questions:
>>
>> * autoConnect - hrm... looking at the usage, I think for messaging it
>> may be more desired to have an explicit 'connect()' hook;
>
> There is one. I could have set it up with autoConnect: false and then explicitly
called connect() when I was ready.
>>
>> * setting up everything up front is OK... but usually you want to be
>> able to 'subscribe' to a channel/topic/queue later on, which the same
>> 'client'
>>
https://github.com/kborchers/vertx-push-demo/blob/aerogear/www/js/index.j...
>
> There will be this feature I just haven't gotten that far yet. I was thinking by
adding/removing channels from the client, that would subscribe/unsubscribe them.
>>
>> * there is a 'onConnectError' - errors could occur in different ways
>> (when receiving, subscribing etc)
>
> Same as above. This will come (if there is a method for catching those errors).
>>
>> * the callback on the channel: here you directly use the 'replyTo' arg
>> (vertx detail), not every lib (e.g. Stomp.js) has something like that:
>>
https://github.com/kborchers/vertx-push-demo/blob/aerogear/www/js/index.j...
>>
>
> This is where I'll need your help since I don't know those details so I will
try to find a way to generalize additional parameters.
Actually, looking at this more, this callback is triggered by the underlying library
(vert.x) so I think have that specific param here is ok because they know they are using
the vert.x adapter. I think we would just need to document the parameters for this
callback in our docs.
not sure I like that; I think - to have some more abstractness -
chaining them is better:
So that ours just really needs the 'message' and we can (if we want)
ignore the replyTo...
>
>>
>> I am sure, more will come, when I start using it
>>
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Soooo…
>>>
>>> That -
https://github.com/kborchers/aerogear-js/tree/Notifier
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> That -
https://github.com/kborchers/vertx-push-demo/tree/aerogear
>>>
>>> Enjoy! :D
>>>
>>> On Feb 22, 2013, at 12:13 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
wrote:
>>>
>>> But, as said on the first email, there is no spec right now...
>>>
>>> BUT..., yes - that's the idea behind the _abstract_ notifier API.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
<matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Summers Pittman
<supittma(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> So, in theory, would I be able to
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) Define a message channel (boats)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> a 'pipe' :) to a server, yes. Publishing from client works. and
receicing msgs on that channel works too
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2) Define a series of systems which implement that channel
(websocket, GCM, carrier pigeon)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> this is just 'js' client api... so... there will be only SockJS
(websocket and legacy fallbacks). No GCM/APNs receiving in JS land (pure mobile web).
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 3) Have AG Auto negotiate systems. (When the app is up use a
websocket system, when it background use GCM, and when the network is down scan QR codes
off pigeons)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I guess anwser to 2) makes sense here ?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Summers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 02/21/2013 12:38 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello!
>>>>>
>>>>> Today, I had a brief chat with Kris about a potential AeroGear
Notifier Client API...
>>>>>
>>>>> The basic idea is to wrap messaging APIs (e.g. Stomp.js, Vertx's
eventbus or Socket.io/Engine.io) behind a common client 'interface'.
>>>>>
>>>>> Basically the AeroGear-Notifier should be able to connect to a
messaging system in order to subscribe to a channel to reveice messages from that channel.
The AG-Notifier is also able to publish messages to ANY channel. Of course,unsubscribe and
disconnect are required too...
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure... the above is not (YET) really a SPEC, but it's start....
the JS API of the AG-Notifier (DRAFT 0.0.1) could looks like this:
>>>>>
>>>>> /**
>>>>> * Connects to a given URL. The callback is invoked after a connection
has been established. In case of an error, an Error
>>>>> * object will be passed to the callback
>>>>> */
>>>>> AeroGear.Notifier.connect(String url, function callback);
>>>>>
>>>>> /**
>>>>> * Tears down the connection. The callback is invoked after a
connection has been closed. In case of an error, an
>>>>> * Error object will be passed to the callback
>>>>> */
>>>>> AeroGear.Notifier.disconnect(function callback);
>>>>>
>>>>> /**
>>>>> * Subscribes to a channel. The callback function is invoked for every
message, received on the given channel.
>>>>> */
>>>>> AeroGear.Notifier.subscribe(String channel, function callback);
>>>>>
>>>>> /**
>>>>> * Removes the subscription of the given channel.
>>>>> */
>>>>> AeroGear.Notifier.unsubscribe(String channel);
>>>>>
>>>>> /**
>>>>> * Publishes a message to a given channel
>>>>> */
>>>>> AeroGear.Notifier.publish(String channel, Object message);
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps a STATE-MASHINE would be nice as well:
>>>>>
>>>>> AeroGear.Notifier.CONNECTING = 0;
>>>>> AeroGear.Notifier.OPEN = 1;
>>>>> AeroGear.Notifier.CLOSING = 2;
>>>>> AeroGear.Notifier.CLOSED = 3;
>>>>>
>>>>> Implementation of the Adapters
>>>>>
>>>>> The different adapter implementations will be done separately:
ag-notifier-vertx.js...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>>
>>>>> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>
>>>> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev