Hello Vivek!
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Vivek Pandey <vivek.pandey(a)pinelabs.com>wrote:
Hi Jay,
Thanks for your reply.
While we have not faced any issues in using UPS in our limited testing, I
often see info stacktraces in ups logs
2014-05-16 10:19:20,032 INFO
[com.notnoop.apns.internal.ApnsConnectionImpl] (Thread-118) Exception while
waiting for error code: java.net.SocketException: Socket closed
at java.net.SocketInputStream.socketRead0(Native Method)
[rt.jar:1.7.0_51]
at java.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:152)
[rt.jar:1.7.0_51]
at java.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:122)
[rt.jar:1.7.0_51]
……………
at
com.notnoop.apns.internal.ApnsConnectionImpl$1MonitoringThread.run(ApnsConnectionImpl.java:114)
[apns-0.2.3.jar:]
These stacktraces coupled with low dev activity of noop/java-apns project
are disconcerting to me.
the stack-trace is no harm - it's only happening w/ doing a monitoring of
the thread (that's what we currently do, when setting up ApnsService - I
thought about explicitly disable that)
The activity of the underlying java-apns is very low, yes! However @froh42
is getting back:
https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns/commits/master
There will be a new release in the near future; @froh42 asked me if I could
help with pushing the bits to maven central
That said, I recently started looking at pushy:
https://github.com/relayrides/pushy
I also sent a PR that would allow us to feed pushy w/ our certificate from
the database:
https://github.com/relayrides/pushy/pull/87
Hope that helps
-Matthias
I am currently using UPS 0.10.2 war.
Thanks,
Vivek
*From:* Jay Balunas [mailto:jbalunas@redhat.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, May 20, 2014 11:36 PM
*To:* vivek.pandey(a)pinelabs.com; AeroGear Developer Mailing List
*Cc:* Jay Balunas
*Subject:* Re: [aerogear-dev] UPS Production worthiness
Hi Vivek,
It's awesome to hear that you have integrated the UPS into your backend
systems and some of your mobile apps!
We have a lot of confidence around the UPS, its functionality, and
performance. Our team has been working hard on improvements and stability
including our QE team. Also, as you may have seen we're planning a 1.0
release of the UPS this summer.
However at this time we don't have specific references or success stories
outside of what you can see in the community mailing lists - other users
using it ;-) We're also about to kick off some performance and scale
testing in the next couple of months.
Have you run into any issues that drove these questions about production
worthiness? If so please let us know and we'll certainly take a look.
Hope this helps!
Thanks,
Jay Balunas
On May 20, 2014, at 8:09 AM, Vivek Pandey <vivek.pandey(a)pinelabs.com>
wrote:
Hello Aerogear dev team,
We integrated UPS into our backend server which is serving various mobile
apps. While the development and testing phase went well, my manager is
questioning me about production worthiness about Aerogear. It would be
great help if you could point me to references/success stories where UPS is
being used in production environments and scaling well in medium to high
loads.
Thanks,
Vivek
------------------------------
This message may contain privileged and confidential information and is
solely for the use of intended recipient. The views expressed in this email
are those of the sender and not of Pine Labs. The recipient should check
this email and attachments for the presence of viruses / malwares etc. Pine
Labs accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by
this email. Pine Labs may monitor and record all emails.
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
------------------------------
This message may contain privileged and confidential information and is
solely for the use of intended recipient. The views expressed in this email
are those of the sender and not of Pine Labs. The recipient should check
this email and attachments for the presence of viruses / malwares etc. Pine
Labs accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by
this email. Pine Labs may monitor and record all emails.
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf