Re: [aerogear-dev] Imporovements to Push Server draft (Was: Some questions about the Unified Push Server...)

On 29/05/2013 18:23, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Almost :) Hybrid would not use SimplePush :) It would use GCM (Cordova on Android) or APNs (Cordova on iOS). 2) "Adds iOS, Android or SimplePush variant", ok ? 4) Let's use the SimplePush (not Simple Push) Yes, my bad on the typo. Should we mention the name of the Push Network name there though? "iOS" and "Android" are platform names, but SimplePush is a Push Network name. This is why I went with "(Hybrid) Web" to keep things consistent. Hylke Mozilla writes it that way as well: https://wiki.mozilla.org/WebAPI/SimplePush On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: Here's the updated graphic: https://github.com/hbons/aerogear-design/blob/master/aerogear_unified_pus... Hylke On 29/05/2013 16:57, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: On 29/05/2013 16:42, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: wow - I like the graphic. A few more "corrections" 1) Developers can also add "SimplePush variant" 2) How about "Mobile application (aka MobileVariantInstance), running on the device, register themselves using a token" ? Sure, I'll fix that. cool 3) I think JBoss AS backend server makes sense here - however, it can be bloody PHP app as well :) True, I think this is a minor