Re: [aerogear-dev] Sync Data model
On 10 Feb 2014, at 13:41, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I've done some work on [1] in regards to coming up with a common sync data format for
our clients, but I and messed it up [2]. Long story short is that I did not take into
account some of client languages features. So here is a new suggestion that will hopefully
work with all our client languages:
public interface SyncObject<T, ID> {
So this is a new voc proposal to replace Document.
+1 on my side
ID objectId();
+1
objectId will work on iOS (better than just id)
String revision();
T content();
}
What do people think about this?
[1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1406
[2]
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear.org/commit/5e81e5526b5850485eeb83a8f...
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev