On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Daniel Bevenius
<daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com>wrote:
Seb: this is for UnifiedPush Server (UPS) and not for the SimplePush
Server (SPS) right? SPS does not have any concept of broadcast.
? My question
was when using the Java Sender Client Impl and you want to broadcast a
message , agnostic from the devices.
On 14 September 2013 09:32, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes but again when you want to do a broadcast to all the devices types
> and broadcast is not anymore available for SPS, does that mean that we must
> send 2 messages : one broadcast for "native" clients and a
"empty"
> selective send for SPS , not sure this is effective ? I must be missing
> something.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Kris Borchers <kborcher(a)redhat.com>wrote:
>
>> The reasoning was that a broadcast can be done via selective if you just
>> send to a category and don't list any specific endpoints. To do a
>> broadcast, you specifically have to register a broadcast endpoint but then
>> your category doesn't have any meaning so it seems like more loss than gain
>> IMO.
>>
>> On Sep 13, 2013, at 7:11, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> What is the reasoning behind this, i think i missed something
>> On Sep 13, 2013, at 3:57 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Concretely what does that means ? removing "simple-push" field from
the
>> broadcast message ?
>> The jira mention that we can achieve the same with a selective send but
>> on the client side when I want to send a broadcast and being agnostic from
>> the receiving clients I still want to use the (Unified) broadcast format.
>> So my question is will SimplePush Clients still receive my message if I
>> broadcast it (and not using the selective send) ?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Daniel Bevenius <
>> daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 I agree that it makes sense to remove broadcast now.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 13 September 2013 09:35, Matthias Wessendorf
<matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Following up on [1], to catch a wider audience, than JIRA.
>>>>
>>>> I do agree that it feels odd, for SimplePush.
>>>>
>>>> -M
>>>>
>>>> [1]
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-323
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>
>>>> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev