Re: [aerogear-dev] Unified Push Server user management questions

Hey, I'd really like to opt for Bootstrap as the base for the presentation/CSS. It has all the components I need, and I've got experience with theming Bootstrap already.

Hylke On 24/06/2013 17:07, Sebastien Blanc wrote: > I agree with Kris about Ember. We already made some tests/apps with angular and backbone. > We should also chose a "presentation framework", my suggestion for this would be topcoat (as we already played a bit with the others) > > > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > I would personally love to see us dive into Ember here but am happy to hear what others on the team think. I think it's a good opportunity to see what is different and show our stuff working with yet another JS framework since it doesn't seem like any single one is winning at the moment. > > On Jun 24, 2013, at 10:59 AM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> So i'm going to use this thread to discuss if we have a requirement for what framework to use for the Admin UI console thing >> >> Here are some choices, but not an exhaustive list: >> >> Ember >> Backbone >> Angular >> Just Straight up HTML/JS/CSS >> Other Buzz Words >> >> Since this is going to be part of the Push server( installed in an App server ) and not a quick start or showcase app, do we need to adhere to a specific framework? >> >> >> On Jun 21, 2013, at 12:25 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Deepali Khushraj <dkhushra(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>> >>> On Jun 21, 2013, at 11:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Deepali Khushraj <dkhushra(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>> Just saw this email. The updates look good. >>>> >>>> Matthias, also one question to you: can a single variant have multiple push networks (APNS, GCM etc) associated with it? All the examples in the spec have only a single push network associated with a "variant", so that part was not clear. >>>> >>>> The idea is: >>>> PushApp: Overall mobile App (e.g. "AeroGear Sports News"). >>>> Variant: A _variation_ of this (for a specific target). "AeroGear Sports News for iOS", "AeroGear Sports News for Android" or "AeroGear Sports News for Web". >>>> >>>> Now... with a bit more "fine tuning" (e.g. the the user/company wants to be fancy and offer specific apps (to the app-store) for iPhone/iPad or Android Tablets/Phones"), these following "variants" could exist for the "AeroGear Sports News" Push Application: >>>> * "AeroGear Sports News for iPhone" >>>> * "AeroGear Sports News for iPad" >>>> * "AeroGear Sports News for iPad mini" >>>> * "AeroGear Sports News for Android-Table" >>>> * "AeroGear Sports News for Google-Glasses" >>>> >>>> Since a variant targets a specific platform, there is no real sense in having the one variant supporting different PushNetworks. thins like that are group under a PushApplication (as explained above). >>>> >>>> >>>> Does that make sense? Do you feel I need to be more clear on that in the spec ? >>> >>> Your approach sounds reasonable. Perhaps just a line in the spec, explicitly stating this, could be useful. >>> >>> Do you plan to allow the user to configure both dev and prod certificates of APNS for a single iOS variant? >>> >>> >>> yes. And I think Hylke's wireframes already indicate that >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -Matthias >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> D. >>>> >>>> On Jun 17, 2013, at 8:19 AM, Hylke Bons <hbons(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> I've updated the wireframes with the points raised, you can find it here: https://raw.github.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/aerogear_unified_push... >>>>> >>>>> I'll address your feedback inline. >>>>> >>>>> On 06/06/2013 01:38, Deepali Khushraj wrote: >>>>>> * It seems from the designs that the user can add only a single OS-specific variant per app. For example, I can create "Mobile HR" app with a single "HR iOS" variant, but not two variants like "HR iPad" and "HR iPhone free". I believe Matthias' lexicon states such multiple variants are possible per app. . >>>>>> >>>>>> I think the way you've done is fine. However, if we choose this path then, I think, we need to update the specification and ensure the REST API won't allow multiple OS-specific variants per app, otherwise, they can't be shown in the UI. >>>>>> >>>>> I forgot a to add this usecase. This can now be done in the "Variants" tab. >>>>> >>>>>> * Apple's Push network has prod and dev environment options, a flag would be useful. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Two certificate files can now be provided: one for production and one for development. Any of the two can be used by mobile apps whether they're deployed or for debugging purposes. >>>>> >>>>>> * The terms "Instance" and "Variant" will be unfamiliar terminologies to a new user. A help icon on the screen or just some text explaining the meanings of these terms to new comers would be helpful >>>>>> >>>>>> * Terminology suggestion: >>>>>> Instance -> "Active user instances" or just "User instances" >>>>>> >>>>> I've changed this to "Mobile Instances" for now, but we can discuss this. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> * I found the name "Variants and Push Networks" confusing. I would suggest we use one :) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Push Networks it is. >>>>> >>>>>> * I noticed you added links to download client SDKs, which is great. I think a link to the Sender REST API spec would be useful too. >>>>>> >>>>> I think this is something we need to fix on the aerogear.org website itself. There should be easy access from the downloads to the API as a "next step". >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> * I found our iOS tutorial to be really helpful. It got the user up and running really quickly. This is something I struggled with Urban Airship and other services. Linking ours to the console could be a real value add to first-time users >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> * We need to check the security aspect of showing end-user emails in the instances tab to the developers of the app. >>>>>> >>>>> Like mentioned by Matthias, this can be anything, not just email addressses. It depends on how the developer sets the system up. >>>>> >>>>>> * Also, if an app gets really popular then this list will likely be really long, like thousands of users. Not sure if our console could handle that. I think this feature of being able to see instances is great in "development mode" or during apps' "beta testing" though. >>>>>> >>>>> It can be a long list and we probably will have to add pagination and filtering. The main usecase here is removing instances to stop them from receiving new push notifications. >>>>> >>>>>> * Is the check-mark in first screen used to make an app active Vs inactive? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It was to to select applications and perform actions on them. I already thought this would be confusing, so I removed them now. An app is active when it has at least one push network enabled. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> * I like that you show the variants summary in first screen, wondering if we could use icons there for iOS, Android & web. >>>>> >>>>> Yep, potentially. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> * I was wondering if we could consider some UX ideas for first-time user experience. I imagine a lot of users using this service would never have used Push before, so they may need some hand holding and the UI is a great way to start that. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Yes, I've added some paragraphs to make things more friendlier, but there's room for improvement. We can fix this as we go. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the feedback. It's been really useful! >>>>> >>>>> Hylke >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>> >>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev