On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 02/03/2015 04:13 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi,
I recently noticed that we are (IMO) incorrectly returning 200 (OK):
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/jaxrs...
Since we really do submit an async job here, and its processing may not
have been started when we do return the 200 (OK), I'd like to propose a
slight change here to instead use 202 (Accepted):
http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.2.3
If the team is OK (ha ha) with this, I will track this in JIRA
This should be OK, I will need to review the Android code.
I hope no Android code is actually using the SENDER api :-)
Is there any downside to accepting results on the client side? (As opposed
to configuring the library comply with a certain version of UPS)
Not sure what you are asking here
-Matthias
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing
listaerogear-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Summers Pittman
>>Phone:404 941 4698
>>Java is my crack.
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf