12:22 p.m.
Cool, I'll look at this—
abstractj
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014 10:49:53 -0300
Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org> wrote:
> Good morning slackland, yesterday I had a hangout with Matthias and we agreed
> that the whole key agreement thing would bring more complexity from the
> developer’s pespective. That’s the reason why the client with airline was
> dropped.
>
> Here comes the new
> proposal: https://gist.github.com/abstractj/ef1e3d53619796f4e87e
>
> # Passphrase encryption for UPS
>
> **Note**: This is NOT a replacement for SSL
>
> ## Scenario
>
> - Developers wants to upload passphrase and certificate for iOS variants. The
> passphrase must be stored encrypted and restored in clear while sending
> messages.
>
> ## Jira references
>
> - https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-565 (*Dropped*). After a hangout
> with Matthias, we agreed that would complicate the developer's workflow.
> - https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-358
>
> ## Proposal
>
> Today we can't guarantee that our developers will have an
> [HSM](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardware_security_module) to manage
> encryption keys. Neither we can store the private keys in a separated
> database, for the push server.
>
> If somehow the database is compromised, private keys could be exposed and
> most of the sensitive data decrypted.
>
> The suggestion is to make use of a *KDF function* per application to encrypt
> passphrases, not perfect, but helps (like we did in the past for password
> reset). Where encryption key means:
>
> ```
> PK = PBKDF2(Secret Key, Salt)
> ```
>
> *Secret Key*: In the ideal world, users would be required to provide a
> password for encryption. In this scenario we don't want them to be prompted
> to input the password, or add extra parameters to the UPS endpoints. So the
> suggestion is to provide secret key configured on the server and protected by
> the ACL's from the operating system
I believe this should be pluggable, not only FS based. For instance, on
AS7/EAP/WF, you'd likely want to use Vault to store sensitive information:
https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation//en-US/JBoss_Enterprise_Appl...
On other containers/platforms, you might have different options. FileSystem is a
good start, but flexibility of such mechanism rocks.
>
> *Salt*: 16 bytes non-deterministic used to encrypt/decrypt the data on the
> server per application and stored into the database.
>
>
>
> ### Secret key configuration
>
> The file can be generated and checked if something exists during the
> application start up.
>
> - config.properties
>
> ```
> secret_key =
> "d9eb5171c59a4c817f68b0de27b8c1e340c2341b52cdbc60d3083d4e8958532" \
> "18dcc5f589cafde048faec956b61f864b9b5513ff9ce29bf9e5d58b0f234f8e3b" ```
>
> or
>
> - config.json
>
> ```
>
{"secret_key":"d9eb5171c59a4c817f68b0de27b8c1e340c2341b52cdbc60d3083d4e8958532"
> \ "18dcc5f589cafde048faec956b61f864b9b5513ff9ce29bf9e5d58b0f234f8e3b"}
> ```
>
> ### Sending push messages
>
> Passphrases must be reversible for Apple, that's why we make use of symmetric
> encryption here.
>
>
>
> # REST API
>
>
> ## Register push app
>
> ```POST | rest/applications```
>
> ### HTTP request
>
> Remain unchanged
>
> ### HTTP response
>
> Remain unchanged
>
> ## iOS Variant
>
> ### HTTP request
>
> Remain unchanged
>
> ### HTTP response
>
> Remain unchanged
>
> ## Sender
>
> ### HTTP request
>
> Remain unchanged
>
> ### HTTP response
>
> Remain unchanged
>
>
> # Clients
>
> No changes at the client side.
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --
> abstractj
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev