1:05 a.m.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 6:04 AM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org> wrote:
Ahoy my friend, answers inline. (my personal opinion)
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Andres Galante <agalante(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> Hi, I am starting to redesign auroras.org. I would like your help to
> understand better the product and our user.
>
> Who is the developer that uses Aerogear? is it a hardcore developer, or
> someone that is looking for a ready made solution?
>
I think both. We have JavaScript, iOS, Android, Cordova, Firefox and
JavaEE developers. For example, some Java EE developers don't care about JS
and they might be looking for a ready made solution (In this situation,
AeroGear with Forge or JBDS is a good fit).
At the same time you have JS developers for example like Lukas or Luke,
which are familiar with Java EE, but they are more like a hardcore
developer and they just want to make use of libraries. Some devs will stick
make use of tools, others to just our libraries.
+1 both are 'target'
> I understand that we have 3 products, Core, Push and security. What is
> our main product?
>
At the moment, I would say that Push is the main AeroGear focus. Although
AG is more than just Push. We provide libraries willing to make developer's
life easy so topics like: Push, Security (cryptography, OAuth2 libraries, 2
factor), data sync, geo-fencing, offline support...and more crazy and dirty
things you could possible imagine with fancy devices — probably AG will be
there.
correct. first push release is done. Work for others (e.g.OAuth2 and
data-sync/offline) is in the works.
> What is a user he looking for when he gets to Aerogear? How can Aerogear
> help him?
>
Most of the developers (others can correct me if I'm wrong) are looking to
boost their productivity. Let's think about something very complex like
cryptography or OAuth2, is really hard to newcomers to grok into RFCs and
implement it. Most part of the time people just want to connect their apps
to Facebook, Twitter, <put your favorite social network here>. People don't
have time and sometimes patience to read RFCs and start from scratch
(because it's boring)
I think this is where AeroGear comes into place. If you talk to Passos, he
will give to you details about reducing 25% of the hard work on Android
with AeroGear.
Right, both are examples to make life easier. Same goes for push. our
server makes it easier to handle and manage all aspects of push.
>
> At this point I would also like to build a “design persona” to have a
> coherent identity, voice and styles throughout our line. If aerogear was a
> person, who would it be? what voice does it have, color, typography, etc.
>
Amazing. Not sure if AeroGear would be a person, but to me is more like
Skipper (
http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130327234948/pixar/images/7/70/Plane...
)
hehe :)
> With this done we will make sure our websites, demos and consoles speak
> the same language.
>
> Thanks
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
--
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf