Re: [aerogear-dev] Sync Data model

On 10 Feb 2014, at 15:49, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > On 02/10/2014 07:41 AM, Daniel Bevenius wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've done some work on [1] in regards to coming up with a common sync data format for our clients, but I and messed it up [2]. Long story short is that I did not take into account some of client languages features. So here is a new suggestion that will hopefully work with all our client languages: >> >> public interface SyncObject<T, ID> { >> ID objectId(); >> String revision(); >> T content(); >> } >> What do people think about this? > One of the things I'm wondering about is, in the far far future in the far far future we’ll review the API. 2.0. I’ll rather to stick to what we need for M1/M2 to start with...

> when our code is told we have the server push^H^H^H^H asynchronously notifying the device of data changes, how will Java know what type the data coming in is? It MAY be useful to have a name space feature in the message. >> >> [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1406 >> [2] https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear.org/commit/5e81e5526b5850485eeb83a8f... >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev