Deprecation also works, although we don't have aerogear-security or
controller. Not sure if you guys need it for
. Once it make use
of PicketLink
On Sep 19, 2014, at 10:16 AM, Lukáš Fryč <lukas.fryc(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Then we may want to remove it in 2.0 until we have a use case for it. WDYT Luke?
yup, lets deprecate, that is, not include it in the build, or we can just delete it
>
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Sep 19, 2014, at 9:22 AM, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On Friday, September 19, 2014 7:12:01 AM, Lukáš Fryč wrote:
>>> Right now Auth module does not seem to serve any purpose anymore,
>>>
>>> but as we have discussed on JS meeting,
>>>
>>> there may possibility to integrate with third-party endpoints such as
>>> Keycloak, Auth0, Mozilla Personas, etc.
>>>
>>>
>>> As I can foresee it, Auth module may serve a purpose of single point
>>> holding authentication data such as tokens,
>>> that can be used for setting up authentication of either third-party
>>> frameworks we use (e.g. in demos, such as in AngularJS this can be
>>> used to register itself to HTTP request interceptor),
>>>
>>> or it may handle authentication for our modules, e.g. Data Sync.
>>>
>>> I'm not saying we shouldn't remove it at this point, but my
question
>>> is rather what do we recommend instead?
>> I'm not saying we remove the auth module system. I'm just proposing we
>> remove that one implementation because it doesn't do anything.
>
> right, we, JS, only have 1 adapter, REST, so it might be that we just remove it
totally
>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> ~ Lukas
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Christos Vasilakis
>>> <cvasilak(a)gmail.com <mailto:cvasilak@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 don’t think it makes sense to keep it, for iOS it was used
>>> only for the Controller case since basic/digest was already
>>> handled by the platform
>>>
>>> -
>>> Christos
>>>
>>> On Sep 16, 2014, at 6:44 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com
>>> <mailto:supittma@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> AGAuthenticationModule was originally made to
>>> login/logout/register with
>>>> the AeroGear controller. Since controller is dead in a ditch
>>> somewhere,
>>>> for AGDroid 2.0 I'm proposing we remove it from the platform.
>>> This will
>>>> leave HttpBasicAuthenticationModule and
>>> HttpDigestAuthenticationModule.
>>>> However I know this also exists for iOS and Javascript so I'm
>>> putting
>>>> this post up for discussion.
>>>>
>>>> wdyt?
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev