Good morning peeps. AeroGear Security 1.2.0 was staged under nexus profile https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/jboss_releases_st... - Instructions to test it * Download the sources from https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-controller-demo/pull/66 * run mvn clean package and deploy it * Make use of these sources to send a request against the server: https://gist.github.com/abstractj/c0b930da58b3b191d653 - Changelog * [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration * [maven-release-plugin] prepare release 1.2.0 * Revert "Preparing to release AeroGear Security 1.2.0" * Merge branch 'parent_pom' * remove stuff provided by the parent pom * add aerogear's parent pom * fix pom formatting * Preparing to release AeroGear Security 1.2.0 * Merge branch 'hawk' * Le missing license headers * Inclusion of Javadocs for Hawk * Update to Hawk 1.0.0 * Fix the error messages * Handle more generic exceptions * Follow the header conventions from Hawk * Hawk server configuration must be provided by the developer * Fix the issues with Hawk and CDI * Merge branch 'formatting' * fix formatting * Merge branch 'license_fixes' * fix license headers * Merge branch 'JavaDocForSecure' * Removing stupid import (thanks Eclipse) * Fixing typos * Adding an XML example... * Adding JAvaDoc for the Secure annotation + Hint on enabling in projects beans.xml file * Update README Feedback, suggestions to improve the documentation, tomatoes are welcome. On wednesday I'll send it to maven central, so if you would like to test, let me know. -- abstractj _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

Hi Bruno, a few things: * the Security Interceptor has been relocated to a new package - not a big deal, I guess a release note is good enough. * Hawk/CDI related things: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGSEC-81 (I have also created a branch for my "testing": https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unified-push-server/tree/AG_SEC_120) -Matthias On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: > Great Job Bruno ! > I will give it a try tomorrow ! > Seb > > > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org&gt;wrote: > >> Good morning peeps. >> >> AeroGear Security 1.2.0 was staged under nexus profile >> >> https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/jboss_releases_st... >> >> - Instructions to test it >> >> * Download the sources from >> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-controller-demo/pull/66 >> * run mvn clean package and deploy it >> * Make use of these sources to send a request against the server: >> https://gist.github.com/abstractj/c0b930da58b3b191d653 >> >> - Changelog >> >> * [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration >> * [maven-release-plugin] prepare release 1.2.0 >> * Revert "Preparing to release AeroGear Security 1.2.0" >> * Merge branch 'parent_pom' >> * remove stuff provided by the parent pom >> * add aerogear's parent pom >> * fix pom formatting >> * Preparing to release AeroGear Security 1.2.0 >> * Merge branch 'hawk' >> * Le missing license headers >> * Inclusion of Javadocs for Hawk >> * Update to Hawk 1.0.0 >> * Fix the error messages >> * Handle more generic exceptions >> * Follow the header conventions from Hawk >> * Hawk server configuration must be provided by the developer >> * Fix the issues with Hawk and CDI >> * Merge branch 'formatting' >> * fix formatting >> * Merge branch 'license_fixes' >> * fix license headers >> * Merge branch 'JavaDocForSecure' >> * Removing stupid import (thanks Eclipse) >> * Fixing typos >> * Adding an XML example... >> * Adding JAvaDoc for the Secure annotation + Hint on enabling in >> projects beans.xml file >> * Update README >> >> Feedback, suggestions to improve the documentation, tomatoes are >> welcome. On wednesday I'll send it to maven central, so if you would >> like to test, let me know. >> >> -- >> abstractj >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >

Hi Bruno, Matthias, here are my findings w.r.t. CDI/Hawk related problem (AGSEC-81): According to CDI spec, HawkAuthenticatorFilter requires HawkServlet and HawkCredentialsProvider beans to have producers during deployment time checks. This means that any user willing to use aerogear-security will need to define @Producers no matter whether he's willing to use Hawk. Proposal: Make Hawk standalone module, not a part of aerogear-security. Users willing to use hawk will need to put it into pom.xml and set @Produces methods. Karel