I would also vote for waiting after 0.11.0 release (+1 on this very nice
refactoring).
Andrea
Bruno Oliveira wrote
I would vote to stabilize 0.11.0 before we start to make big
changes.
On 2014-06-12, Karel Piwko wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 16:48:07 +0200
> Sebastien Blanc <
scm.blanc@
> wrote:
>
> > I'm also +1 but maybe better to wait after 0.11 no ?
> >
> Likely, too many things have been changed in 0.11 already ;-)
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <
matzew@
>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 on that!
> > >
> > > Should we do that for the 0.11 ? Or after?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Karel Piwko <
kpiwko@
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 on not having separate table per variant type and using different
> > >> inheritance model here - for instance a discriminator column.
> > >>
> > >> Karel
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 15:14:21 +0200
> > >> Erik Jan de Wit <
edewit@
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > Right now the domain model of the UnifiedPush Server has the
> variants
> > >> split
> > >> > into separate collections.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
>
https://github.com/edewit/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/model/a...
> > >> >
> > >> > This could be improved to only use one collection, we’ll get more
> > >> > extendibility (adding another variant type for instance) and
> remove
> > >> code like
> > >> > this:
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
>
https://github.com/edewit/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/model/j...
> > >> >
> > >> > In places where you only want the iOS variants for instance you
> could
> > >> either
> > >> > query them, or have a getter that collects them by type.
> > >> >
> > >> > What do you think?
> > >> >
> > >> > Cheers,
> > >> > Erik Jan
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> aerogear-dev mailing list
> > >>
aerogear-dev@.jboss
> > >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > >
aerogear-dev@.jboss
> >
> > >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
>
aerogear-dev@.jboss
--
abstractj
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@.jboss
--
View this message in context:
http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-UnifiedPush-Server...
Sent from the aerogear-dev mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.