On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 16:48:07 +0200
Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
wrote:
> +1 on that!
>
> Should we do that for the 0.11 ? Or after?
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 on not having separate table per variant type and using different
>> inheritance model here - for instance a discriminator column.
>>
>> Karel
>>
>> On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 15:14:21 +0200
>> Erik Jan de Wit <edewit(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Right now the domain model of the UnifiedPush Server has the variants
>> split
>> > into separate collections.
>> >
>> >
>>
https://github.com/edewit/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/model/a...
>> >
>> > This could be improved to only use one collection, we’ll get more
>> > extendibility (adding another variant type for instance) and remove
>> code like
>> > this:
>> >
>> >
>>
https://github.com/edewit/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/model/j...
>> >
>> > In places where you only want the iOS variants for instance you could
>> either
>> > query them, or have a getter that collects them by type.
>> >
>> > What do you think?
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Erik Jan
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>