+1
On Aug 28, 2013, at 10:39 AM, Kris Borchers <kborcher(a)redhat.com
<mailto:kborcher@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 28, 2013, at 9:36, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com
> <mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> +1 Sounds good and I've moved the following task into SimplePush
>> 0.9.0 for the clean up of channelIds:
>>
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-204
>
> Perfect, thanks!
>>
>>
>> On 28 August 2013 16:32, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com
>> <mailto:supittma@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On 08/28/2013 10:12 AM, Kris Borchers wrote:
>>> As I work more and more toward aligning with the API spec laid
>>> out by Mozilla for SimplePush, I find myself needing to make a
>>> major change to the way we have implemented channel
>>> registrations. Basically what I have found is that our storage
>>> and reuse of channels between app restart/refresh, though meant
>>> to be an improvement to performance, is causing more issues than
>>> it's solving.
>>>
>>> The Proposal
>>> I would like to only persist the user agent id (UAID) in storage
>>> and only keep the channel registrations in memory while the app
>>> is running. Each time the app starts up, the workflow would be:
>>>
>>> * First Start
>>> 1. Client Hello => Server
>>> 2. Server Ack => Client
>>> 3. Client 1 or more channel registrations => Server
>>> 4. Server stores channel and sends pushEndpoint => Client
>>> 5. Client registers endpont => App Server or UP Server
>>> 6. Push messages abound
>>> * Restart / Refresh
>>> 1. Client Hello => Server
>>> 2. Server recognizes UAID and since no channels were
>>> included in Hello, all existing channels are removed as
>>> per the spec and sends Ack => Client
>>> 3. Client 1 or more channel registrations => Server
>>> 4. Server stores channel and sends pushEndpoint => Client
>>> 5. Client registers endpont => App Server or UP Server
>>> 6. Push messages abound
>>>
>>>
>>> The only possible downside I see here is there will be slightly
>>> more chatter over the network since the registrations will
>>> happen every time the app loads. There should be no performance
>>> decrease and may see a performance boost since we will be
>>> eliminating a number of synchronous calls into localStorage. The
>>> main benefit is that this will allow us to almost completely
>>> synchronize our API with Mozilla's which would then allow for
>>> immediate use of one of our apps as a web app and Firefox OS app
>>> with NO modifications.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts?
>> Sounds good. While not 100% related rerunning registration on
>> app load is something Google suggests for GCM.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev