9:29 p.m.
I've noticed that some failures using the new metamodel are due to embedded IDs being
annotated with @Id instead of @EmbeddedId.
Should Hibernate support this mapping?
Thanks,
Gail
10:56 p.m.
Up until now, we've always sided with backward compatibility, even if it's against
the spec. We do have https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/HHH-7803 to introduce settings
that would ease the restrictions. Should this fall under that?
Brett Meyer
Red Hat Software Engineer, Hibernate
+1 260.349.5732
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gail Badner" <gbadner(a)redhat.com>
To: "hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org hibernate-dev"
<hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 3:29:08 PM
Subject: [hibernate-dev] Should Hibernate support @Id for embedded IDs
I've noticed that some failures using the new metamodel are due to embedded IDs being
annotated with @Id instead of @EmbeddedId.
Should Hibernate support this mapping?
Thanks,
Gail
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
11:11 p.m.
Are you talking about non-aggregated composite ids? If so, the question is
not just about backwards compatibilty. This is a vendor specific feature
and the question becones whether that feature is still worthwhile.
On Jan 15, 2013 3:56 PM, "Brett Meyer" <brmeyer(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Up until now, we've always sided with backward compatibility,
even if it's
against the spec. We do have https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/HHH-7803to introduce
settings that would ease the restrictions. Should this fall
under that?
Brett Meyer
Red Hat Software Engineer, Hibernate
+1 260.349.5732
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gail Badner" <gbadner(a)redhat.com>
To: "hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org hibernate-dev" <
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 3:29:08 PM
Subject: [hibernate-dev] Should Hibernate support @Id for embedded IDs
I've noticed that some failures using the new metamodel are due to
embedded IDs being annotated with @Id instead of @EmbeddedId.
Should Hibernate support this mapping?
Thanks,
Gail
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
11:33 p.m.
This is an aggregated composite ID.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Ebersole" <steve(a)hibernate.org>
To: "Brett Meyer" <brmeyer(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "Gail Badner" <gbadner(a)redhat.com>, "Hibernate
hibernate-dev" <hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 2:11:24 PM
Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] Should Hibernate support @Id for embedded IDs
Are you talking about non-aggregated composite ids? If so, the
question is not just about backwards compatibilty. This is a vendor
specific feature and the question becones whether that feature is
still worthwhile.
On Jan 15, 2013 3:56 PM, "Brett Meyer" < brmeyer(a)redhat.com > wrote:
Up until now, we've always sided with backward compatibility, even if
it's against the spec. We do have
https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/HHH-7803 to introduce settings
that would ease the restrictions. Should this fall under that?
Brett Meyer
Red Hat Software Engineer, Hibernate
+1 260.349.5732
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gail Badner" < gbadner(a)redhat.com >
To: " hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org hibernate-dev" <
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 3:29:08 PM
Subject: [hibernate-dev] Should Hibernate support @Id for embedded
IDs
I've noticed that some failures using the new metamodel are due to
embedded IDs being annotated with @Id instead of @EmbeddedId.
Should Hibernate support this mapping?
Thanks,
Gail
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
12:15 a.m.
I've added this to the list in HHH-7803.
Thanks,
Gail
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gail Badner" <gbadner(a)redhat.com>
To: "Steve Ebersole" <steve(a)hibernate.org>
Cc: "Hibernate hibernate-dev" <hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 2:33:41 PM
Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] Should Hibernate support @Id for embedded IDs
This is an aggregated composite ID.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Ebersole" <steve(a)hibernate.org>
> To: "Brett Meyer" <brmeyer(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: "Gail Badner" <gbadner(a)redhat.com>, "Hibernate
hibernate-dev"
> <hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 2:11:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] Should Hibernate support @Id for
> embedded IDs
>
>
>
> Are you talking about non-aggregated composite ids? If so, the
> question is not just about backwards compatibilty. This is a vendor
> specific feature and the question becones whether that feature is
> still worthwhile.
> On Jan 15, 2013 3:56 PM, "Brett Meyer" < brmeyer(a)redhat.com >
> wrote:
>
>
> Up until now, we've always sided with backward compatibility, even
> if
> it's against the spec. We do have
> https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/HHH-7803 to introduce settings
> that would ease the restrictions. Should this fall under that?
>
> Brett Meyer
> Red Hat Software Engineer, Hibernate
> +1 260.349.5732
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gail Badner" < gbadner(a)redhat.com >
> To: " hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org hibernate-dev" <
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 3:29:08 PM
> Subject: [hibernate-dev] Should Hibernate support @Id for embedded
> IDs
>
> I've noticed that some failures using the new metamodel are due to
> embedded IDs being annotated with @Id instead of @EmbeddedId.
>
> Should Hibernate support this mapping?
>
> Thanks,
> Gail
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
12:37 a.m.
Ah. I'd be inclined to not support that.
So -1 from me
On Jan 15, 2013 4:33 PM, "Gail Badner" <gbadner(a)redhat.com> wrote:
This is an aggregated composite ID.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Ebersole" <steve(a)hibernate.org>
> To: "Brett Meyer" <brmeyer(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: "Gail Badner" <gbadner(a)redhat.com>, "Hibernate
hibernate-dev" <
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 2:11:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] Should Hibernate support @Id for embedded
IDs
>
>
>
> Are you talking about non-aggregated composite ids? If so, the
> question is not just about backwards compatibilty. This is a vendor
> specific feature and the question becones whether that feature is
> still worthwhile.
> On Jan 15, 2013 3:56 PM, "Brett Meyer" < brmeyer(a)redhat.com >
wrote:
>
>
> Up until now, we've always sided with backward compatibility, even if
> it's against the spec. We do have
> https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/HHH-7803 to introduce settings
> that would ease the restrictions. Should this fall under that?
>
> Brett Meyer
> Red Hat Software Engineer, Hibernate
> +1 260.349.5732
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gail Badner" < gbadner(a)redhat.com >
> To: " hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org hibernate-dev" <
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 3:29:08 PM
> Subject: [hibernate-dev] Should Hibernate support @Id for embedded
> IDs
>
> I've noticed that some failures using the new metamodel are due to
> embedded IDs being annotated with @Id instead of @EmbeddedId.
>
> Should Hibernate support this mapping?
>
> Thanks,
> Gail
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>
4124
days inactive
4124
days old
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Brett Meyer -
Gail Badner -
Steve Ebersole