Re: [infinispan-dev] Dropping AtomicMap/FineGrainedAtomicMap
Hi,
On 01/20/2014 11:28 AM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
Hi all,
Dropping AtomicMap and FineGrainedAtomicMap was discussed last week in the F2F meeting
[1]. It's complex and buggy, and we'd recommend people to use the Grouping API
instead [2]. Grouping API would allow data to reside together, while the standard map API
would apply per-key locking.
+1. are we going to dropping the Delta stuff?
We don't have a timeline for this yet, but we want to get as much feedback on the
topic as possible so that we can evaluate the options.
before starting with it, I would recommend to add the following method
to cache API:
/**
* returns all the keys and values associated with the group name. The
Map<K, V> is immutable (i.e. read-only)
**/
Map<K, V> getGroup(String groupName);
Cheers,
Pedro
Cheers,
[1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3901
[2] http://infinispan.org/docs/6.0.x/user_guide/user_guide.html#_the_grouping...
--
Galder Zamarreño
galder(a)redhat.com
twitter.com/galderz
Project Lead, Escalante
http://escalante.io
Engineer, Infinispan
http://infinispan.org
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev