2010/7/26 Manik Surtani <manik(a)jboss.org>:
On 26 Jul 2010, at 09:33, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
> Looks to me that this is an issue with stoppage priorities. ReplicationQueue.stop()
should happen before JGroupsTransport.stop()
>
> At the moment, both @Stop methods are defined without priority
(JGroupsTransport's @Stop is on Transport interface), so they assumed default which is
10.
>
> It's unclear from @Stop how the priorities work (javadoc needs to be clearer cos
at the moment it's a copy/paste of @Start), but I think (without looking at the code)
that higher priorities (= lower numbers) would be stopped first.
>
> So, you could try setting RQ's stop to 9 and @Stop in transport to 10 (default)
and and see if it works.
+1, that should do it for you.
Thanks for all answers,
I'm trying it but as the exception was showing up very occasionally I
can't tell you if it's fixed (I might be able to tell that it's not
fixed).
Shouldn't this change be applied ? (shall I open an issue?)
Sanne
>
> On Jul 25, 2010, at 7:15 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> I got the following stacktrace using CR2:
>> [exec] java.lang.NullPointerException
>> [exec] at
>>
org.infinispan.remoting.rpc.RpcManagerImpl.invokeRemotely(RpcManagerImpl.java:92)
>> [exec] at
>>
org.infinispan.remoting.rpc.RpcManagerImpl.invokeRemotely(RpcManagerImpl.java:128)
>> [exec] at
>> org.infinispan.remoting.ReplicationQueue.flush(ReplicationQueue.java:147)
>> [exec] at
>> org.infinispan.remoting.ReplicationQueue$1.run(ReplicationQueue.java:99)
>> [exec] at
>> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:441)
>> [exec] at
>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:317)
>> [exec] at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:150)
>> [exec] at
>>
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$101(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:98)
>> [exec] at
>>
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.runPeriodic(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:181)
>> [exec] at
>>
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:205)
>> [exec] at
>>
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
>> [exec] at
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
>> [exec] at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
>>
>>> From which I went to inspect
>> org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport; in this
>> class the "members" field is initialized as Collections.emptyList()
>> and it appears that the only way to become null is by stopping the
>> cache.
>> Also it seems that in many points the check "members!=null" is
>> performed, but not in RpcManagerImpl.
>>
>> Could the stop() method be changed to set this value to emptyList()
>> too, so that all those "!=null" checks could be avoided, or if you see
>> good reasons to throw an error then what would be a better one than
>> NPE.
>>
>> I'm also wondering if this is supposed to happen: isn't this a race
>> condition during the stop process of the cache? I'd like to stop it
>> after all replications have been sent, seems cleaner.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Sanne
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
> --
> Galder Zamarreño
> Sr. Software Engineer
> Infinispan, JBoss Cache
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Manik Surtani
manik(a)jboss.org
Lead, Infinispan
Lead, JBoss Cache
http://www.infinispan.org
http://www.jbosscache.org
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev