What's the point for these tests?
On 20 Jan 2014 15:48, "Radim Vansa" <rvansa(a)redhat.com> wrote:
OK, I have results for dist-udp-no-tx or local-no-tx modes on 8
nodes
(in local mode the nodes don't communicate, naturally):
Dist mode: 3 % down for reads, 1 % for writes
Local mode: 19 % down for reads, 16 % for writes
Details in [1], ^ is for both keys and values stored as binary.
Radim
[1]
https://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/jdg-radargun-perf-st...
On 01/20/2014 11:14 AM, Pedro Ruivo wrote:
>
> On 01/20/2014 10:07 AM, Mircea Markus wrote:
>> Would be interesting to see as well, though performance figure would
not include the network latency, hence it would not tell much about the
benefit of using this on a real life system.
> that's my point. I'm interested to see the worst scenario since all
> other cluster modes, will have a lower (or none) impact in performance.
>
> Of course, the best scenario would be only each node have access to
> remote keys...
>
> Pedro
>
>> On Jan 20, 2014, at 9:48 AM, Pedro Ruivo <pedro(a)infinispan.org> wrote:
>>
>>> IMO, we should try the worst scenario: Local Mode + Single thread.
>>>
>>> this will show us the highest impact in performance.
>> Cheers,
>>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Radim Vansa <rvansa(a)redhat.com>
JBoss DataGrid QA
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev