Re: [infinispan-dev] Feedback and requests on clustered and remote listeners

>> >> If you do that you must also provide an abstract class with default noop operations that filter implementations would extend. Otherwise you are back with backward compatibility problems. > > KeyValueFilter was introduced in 7.0, or other backward compatibility problem you have in mind? I believe Emmanuel is referring to if we added additional operations to the filter, but I am not sure what other operations we would want to add to it. If anything we would probably make a different type of filter specific to its use case.