Re: [infinispan-dev] Hybrid locking scheme in ISPN 5.2.0

On 15 May 2012, at 17:10, Galder Zamarreño wrote: > You have not yet given me a single reason why we should put back something that's flawed. All you've said is: i rely on X and I want it back. Well, the old scheme was broken and there are several good reasons why we moved to a more consistent approach. Diego, can't your work be modified to work with the new schemes?