On 3 January 2012 16:40, Mircea Markus <mircea.markus(a)jboss.com> wrote:
On 3 Jan 2012, at 17:10, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> Hi Galder,
> I agree with you, the command looks like a better place to place the
> Flags.
+1. The InvocationContext is something local, so if we need remote propagation the flags
should be associated with the command.
> The only mismatch is with the origin where flags are enabled,
> but I consider this as a convenience rather than a source of
> surprising mismatches as I don't see how this API could lead to
> unexpected results.
>
> So the idea is in the future to avoid checking for flags in the
> context but rather look in the command directly? So that we can avoid
> copying them in the invocation context.
can't we just drop the flags from the invocation context entirely?
+1 same we're suggesting as well ;)