Why is that JIRA closed? I was about to suggest that a complete JIRA
triage in Alpha -> Beta stage could help, but that wouldn't notice
closed ones.
R.
On 02/27/2017 11:57 AM, Galder ZamarreƱo wrote:
We keep missing the train :(
Enabling WSC by default is something we've discussed before (JIRA & dev list),
e.g.
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3655
Cheers,
--
Galder ZamarreƱo
Infinispan, Red Hat
> On 24 Feb 2017, at 15:45, Dan Berindei <dan.berindei(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I still think WSC should be enabled by default, but we probably missed
> the 9.0 train.
>
> I see the 8.0 discussion also included batching, i.e. hiding the WSC
> options and forcing batching to use optimistic locking w/out WSC
> (currently batching allows any locking type, but batch transactions
> are isolated from external transactions). That would be at odds with
> Sanne's suggestions in the "major version cleaning" thread, because
> those would require a batch to join any external transaction.
>
> Cheers
> Dan
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Radim Vansa <rvansa(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am writing a bit too late in 9.0 cycle, but since I've found couple of
>> bugs [1][2] and spaces for improvement [3][4] in WSC implementation, I
>> was wondering about confirming the performance effect of fixes. And I am
>> wondering if the current defaults for transactional cache, being
>> READ_COMMITTED and WSC off are the best options.
>>
>> During 8.0 cycle Tristan raised a discussion [5] including WSC defaults
>> and I think that the general opinion was "make it default", which
>> requires RR isolation and simple versioning scheme. But I think that the
>> whole thing [6] went a bit forgotten and all that was done is [7].
>>
>> Do we want to do this, at least using current API? (we most likely don't
>> want to refactor ConfigurationBuilder when CR2 is out)
>>
>> Radim
>>
>> [1]
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-7526
>> [2]
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-7527
>> [3]
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-7528
>> [4]
>>
https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/blob/master/core/src/main/java/o...
>> could be a contention point
>> [5]
>>
http://infinispan.markmail.org/message/rasqqkojwdboql7y?q=write+skew+list...
>> [6]
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3927
>> [7]
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-7507
>>
>> --
>> Radim Vansa <rvansa(a)redhat.com>
>> JBoss Performance Team
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev