Well yes, but I can't think of anything better. :)
On 24 Nov 2011, at 10:05, Pete Muir wrote:
Nice idea. Any objections?
On 24 Nov 2011, at 09:55, Tristan Tarrant wrote:
> On 11/24/2011 10:53 AM, Pete Muir wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> Any ideas on the below? Issue is that the sane name for this method is
getConfiguration() but this name is already taken. Options I see are:
>>
>> 1) Use another name (ugh)
> What about a pseudo-fluent Cache.configuration() ? You can then add
> @Deprecated to the existing Cache.getConfiguration() for one cycle and
> then swap as you say below.
>> 2) Swap the return types with no deprecation stage (ugh)
>>
>> Any better ideas?
>>
>>
> Tristan
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Manik Surtani
manik(a)jboss.org
twitter.com/maniksurtani
Lead, Infinispan
http://www.infinispan.org