I dislike having any logic based on the port number in some range; it's
not common that behaviour would change if you set port to 9xxx instead
of 8xxx.
Is there an (up-to-date) design doc?
I don't fully follow, but if there's a problem in the HTTP handlers you
can add a PING-detecting handler below...?
Radim
On 12/10/2018 03:27 PM, Sebastian Laskawiec wrote:
Hey guys,
During Infinispan F2F, I had a short discussion with Tristan on Single
Port client-side implementation. Back then, we agreed that the client
should always send a Hotrod Ping request and if won't get any response
(or get some HTTP content back), it will try to upgrade to the Hotrod
protocol using Single Port.
I've been playing with the implementation for a while, and
implementing it this way seems a bit "inconvenient" to me. The Ping
Operation uses 60s timeout, which seems to be a good fit as a default.
Unfortunately, for the Single Port functionality, this means we'd need
to wait 60s until we try to send HTTP request and do an upgrade. Also,
another problematic part is in Netty's HTTP handlers
(HttpObjectDecoder, HttpServerCodec and ByteToMessageDecoder). When
those classes fail to decode a message (REST expects HTTP rather than
a stream of bytes specific to Hotrod protocol), they just ignore it
and keep the channel in active state (which also makes sense for
HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2).
At this point, my intuition tells, that this doesn't look right and
seems to be a over-complicated. The whole HTTP upgrade idea seems to
work the other way around, use HTTP as a fallback and then upgrade to
other protocols. Forcing it to work a bit differently requires some
more effort.
What if we preserved the Single Port setting in the client
configuration but implemented it as an enum with the following values
- true/false/auto. In automatic mode, the client would check if the
server port is set to 8\d{1,3} (this covers 80, 8080, 8081, 8443 and
friends). If that is true, we'd try to follow HTTP Upgrade procedure.
This looks very simple and I think this might actually work. Please
note, that we need the single port setting in the client configuration
to cover some corner cases like the Single Port exposed on different
port (like 4444) or Hot Rod exposed on port that starts with 8.
What do you think about such simplification?
Thanks,
Sebastian
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev