Right: the localHost:localPort combo of the client socket cannot be the
same as that of the remoteHost:remotePort.
Do you happen to have the link to the JGroups issue? I also remember
this, but googling I failed to find it. Perhaps we can use the same
solution here that we used for the JGRP issue.
I vaguely recall we checked the client's local address:port against some
server address:port and closed/re-created it is the same.
On 11/08/17 20:56, Dennis Reed wrote:
On 08/11/2017 11:50 AM, Galder ZamarreƱo wrote:
> I must admit this scenario sounds very weird... how does Java allow you for a local
port to be bound to a port that's already in use by the server? It doesn't make
sense.
You cannot bind to a port that's already in use.
But if you're trying to connect to a port in the ephemeral range that's
not in use, and the OS happens to assign that same IP:port to the local
socket, it can connect to itself.
(We've run into this in JGroups before, and it was a pain to track down
what was going on).
-Dennis
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Bela Ban |
http://www.jgroups.org