I'm trying to think of how this can be. Worker threads adding data, adding
stuff to the async cache store queue for flushing. The eviction thread
removing stuff from the data container *only*.
*Perhaps* what you see is a race where you have:
1 add item to data container
2 enqueue in async cache store for storage
3 evict in memory
4 attempt a get
Actually, the more I think about it, the transaction probably fails because
the datacontainer has been emptied (get(key) does not work anymore).... But
it is definitely not supposed to die silently !
where steps 1 - 4 happen *before* the async cache store can flush its queue
to disk. So this would result in the thread in 4 consulting the data
container, not finding the entry, then checking the cache store and not
finding it there either since it hasn't been flushed yet.
Now IMO this is normal behaviour - the price you pay for asynchronously
writing to a store. But perhaps this window can be
Am I missing something ? Loosing data is something I cannot afford ! I Plan
to use this store as a *permanent* one... I have no backup ! (Actually S3 is
the backup) - So, no, I don't want this ... at any price ;-)
reduced by looking through the async queue as well, before checking
the
underlying store. But as I said, this just reduces the size of this window
and not eliminate it altogether, since this is async and there is no
guarantee that the cache store has finished writing internally (e.g., an
fsync() operation or in the case of S3, Amazon's eventual consistency
model).
Why should eviction be transactional? I don't need eviction to be an
all-or-nothing, reversible event. :) If an entry gets evicted, cool. If
not (for whatever reason), too bad, move on to the next evictable entry.
You are right, we don't want to rollback evictions... but maybe we should
use a priority queue to be sure that evictions are done after any other
command ? Doesn't it solve it all ?
1) The eviction thread runs (we could lower the priority of this thread too)
2) It fills a queue of keys to evict
3) The async queue is prioritized and evicts entries ... when there is
nothing else to do (suddenly it looks like garbage collecting)
WDYT ?
Cheers
Manik
Looks like a design issue ? WDYT ?
Cheers,
Phil
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Manik Surtani <manik(a)jboss.org> wrote:
> That is strange since there is no correlation between eviction and the
> synchronicity of cache stores. Have you got a reproducible test for this?
>
> Cheers
> Manik
>
> On 3 Feb 2010, at 18:37, Philippe Van Dyck wrote:
>
> Thanks Manik,
>
> I have a another problem with eviction, it seems to destroy cache entries,
> *only when I use async*.
>
> Of course, all updates are transactional.
>
> Where should I search for clues ? Any idea ?
>
> Here is my config:
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>
> <infinispan
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
> xmlns="urn:infinispan:config:4.0">
> <global>
> <transport
>
>
transportClass="org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport">
> <properties>
> <property name="configurationFile" value="jgroups.xml" />
> </properties>
> </transport>
>
> </global>
>
> <namedCache name="qi4j">
> <transaction
>
transactionManagerLookupClass="org.infinispan.transaction.lookup.DummyTransactionManagerLookup"
> />
> <clustering mode="distribution">
> <l1 enabled="true" lifespan="100000" />
> <hash numOwners="1" rehashRpcTimeout="120000" />
> </clustering>
>
> <loaders passivation="false" shared="true"
preload="false">
>
> <loader class="org.infinispan.loaders.file.FileCacheStore"
> fetchPersistentState="false" ignoreModifications="false"
> purgeOnStartup="true">
> <properties>
> <property name="location" value="/tmp" />
> </properties>
> <async enabled="true" threadPoolSize="3" />
> </loader>
>
> </loaders>
> <deadlockDetection enabled="true"
> spinDuration="1000"></deadlockDetection>
>
> <eviction strategy="FIFO" wakeUpInterval="1000"
maxEntries="10" />
>
> <unsafe unreliableReturnValues="true" />
>
> </namedCache>
> </infinispan>
>
>
> phil
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Manik Surtani <manik(a)jboss.org> wrote:
>
>> Ugh, good point. I thought the unit tests would have trapped a dumb-ass
>> mistake like this.
>>
>> The reason for transforming the name of the bucket is that we usually use
>> hashcodes as the bucket name, which can take Integer.MIN_VALUE to
>> Integer.MAX_VALUE. These are then translated into Strings, and this becomes
>> the name of the storage unit, e.g., 12345.bucket in the FileCacheStore. Now
>> filesystems are happy to accept a -12345.bucket but certain cloud storage
>> providers barf when encountering the '-' character. Hence the
>> transformation to A12345.bucket in some cases.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Manik
>>
>> PS: pushing up a new snapshot as I type, containing this fix + lower
>> verbosity on eviction-related lock timeouts.
>>
>> On 3 Feb 2010, at 17:16, Philippe Van Dyck wrote:
>>
>> And BTW, why do it ?
>>
>> p
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Philippe Van Dyck <pvdyck(a)gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 6:15 PM
>> Subject: CloudCacheStore Bug
>> To: infinispan -Dev List <infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> there is a bug in CloudCacheStore that makes me feel like I am the only
>> one using it ;-)
>>
>> in CR4 : if you change the "-" sign to "A" in getBucketName
... you need
>> to do the opposite somewhere (or call it every time) ;-)
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> p
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>>
>> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>>
>>
>> --
>> Manik Surtani
>> manik(a)jboss.org
>> Lead, Infinispan
>> Lead, JBoss Cache
>>
http://www.infinispan.org
>>
http://www.jbosscache.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
>
> --
> Manik Surtani
> manik(a)jboss.org
> Lead, Infinispan
> Lead, JBoss Cache
>
http://www.infinispan.org
>
http://www.jbosscache.org
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Manik Surtani
manik(a)jboss.org
Lead, Infinispan
Lead, JBoss Cache
http://www.infinispan.org
http://www.jbosscache.org
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev