I've gone and removed @version javadoc annotations from files
containing them.
On 08/04/2009 02:00 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
> Yeah I agree. Lets not use $Id$ as they are pretty meaningless. Any
> meaningful info $Id$ exposes can be gleaned using svn log anyway.
>
> On 4 Aug 2009, at 11:23, Galder Zamarreno wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 08/04/2009 12:21 PM, Galder Zamarreno wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I see that Vladimir has started to use things like this in the
>>> javadoc
>>> of some classes:
>>>
>>> @version $Id$
>>>
>>> In the past, I had loads of issues with this when trying to apply
>>> patches because this information varies from commit to commit and
>>> hence
>>> they cannot be matched :(
>>
>> And personally, I don't they add anything that cannot be retrieved
>> with
>> svn history...
>>
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>
>> --
>> Galder ZamarreƱo
>> Sr. Software Engineer
>> Infinispan, JBoss Cache
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
> --
> Manik Surtani
> manik(a)jboss.org
> Lead, Infinispan
> Lead, JBoss Cache
>
http://www.infinispan.org
>
http://www.jbosscache.org
>
>
>
>
--
Galder ZamarreƱo
Sr. Software Engineer
Infinispan, JBoss Cache