Re: [infinispan-dev] Evaluating Infinispan

Dnia piątek 25 wrzesień 2009 o 15:18:45 Manik Surtani napisał(a): >> Yeah, it's a kind of love-hate relationship. I personally prefer to >> have them >> everywhere (and sometimes come up with really bizarre contraptions). >> At least >> one prominent book writer thought once I was an expert on the >> topic ;) > > I used to have them everywhere in JBC and IMO it made the internal > code very inflexible as everything needed to be parameterized in very > unnecessary ways. It's more of a chore than inflexibility, because the types must match anyway, generics or not. But the declarations spread like a wildfire. Give me [more] type inference and type aliases and I'm almost happy :)

Or maybe it's better to switch to Scala.

>> I actually read about it on your blog and assumed that it's a public >> API :) I >> thought I could use it to solve some problems relating to lack of >> tree >> structure (or, more specifically, lack of getChildrenNames()). > > In future it is something we may make public. But needs some more > thought before it is made public, as you can imagine. :) I can see you changed some things already (and the TreeCache.getCache () thing). Unfortunately currently I have some other things to do than porting to Infinispan, but I'll get back to it some day :)