Re: [infinispan-dev] ISPN-2281 effect on Infinispan Server

On 05/02/2013 08:00 PM, Tristan Tarrant wrote: > Not as easy as it sounds: we need to change the Infinispan subsystem to > be able to specify equivalence, and then a container like that could not > host memcached or rest caches... > Can we provide a quick fix for AnyEquivalence just for Beta1 ? I can do it. > I've issued a few PRs to fix this: introduce an AnyServerEquivalence for servers and also add support to native byte[] in DefaultTwoWayKey2StringMapper. The async RemoteCacheStore is still failing, but I'm giving up for now...