Galder, Manik, the jira you mention is ISPN-3140 JMX operation to
suppress state transfer [1], implemented quite a long time ago. This
should solve the problem of many simultaneous joiners. Does this fit
your needs?
[1]
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3140
On 01/23/2015 06:10 PM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
Hey Manik, I think I remember some JIRA to have a state transfer
manually, upon management operation or similar, in order to avoid state transfer mayhem
when bringing a lot of nodes at the same time. I don’t know what’s happened to that, but
would it work?
Cheers,
On 17 Jan 2015, at 02:43, Manik Surtani <manik(a)infinispan.org> wrote:
> Greetings. :-)
>
> I chatted with a few of you offline about this earlier; anyone has any thoughts
around a ClusterLoader implementation that, instead of broadcasting to the entire cluster,
unicasts to the owners of a given key by inspecting the DistributionManager. Thinking of
using this as a lazy/on-demand form of state transfer in a distributed cluster, so joiners
don’t trigger big chunks of data moving around eagerly.
>
> • M
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Galder Zamarreño
galder(a)redhat.com
twitter.com/galderz
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev