On 30 May 2012, at 13:55, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
On 30 May 2012 13:36, Manik Surtani <manik(a)jboss.org> wrote:
> Well, one problem leads to another, as you are well aware. Flaky parallel suite
leads careless commits. Yes, we should fix what is broken at the moment but that is not
enough since it will get this way again unless we have a stable suite that can be used to
ensure quality moving fwd. The options are:
>
> 1. We always use the sequential suite.
> 2. We identify tests that are reliable with the parallel suite (should be at least
90% of the tests IMO) and use this, leaving the sequential suite to BuildHive.
Ah, now I understand. You want to have some tests executed only when
run sequentially.. that looks like a nice compromise, cheers!
that will also speed up our test runs, as not all tests are executed;
we could exclude also some of the slower ones even if they could work
fine in parallel.
Precisely. No loss in quality, just changing the order of delivery of information to the
reviewer. :)
--
Manik Surtani
manik(a)jboss.org
twitter.com/maniksurtani
Lead, Infinispan
http://www.infinispan.org