Re: [infinispan-dev] Ideas for locking improvements

> 1. Suggesting deferring local locks till prepare-time: wouldn't this create a potentially large number of transaction failures? Since write skews and overwriting may become a problem if this is allowed. I agree, but as far as I understood by talking to Mircea this is what the current implementation does: it acquired the locks locally but the key owners don't know about it until commit time. So from that I inferred that - while it surprised me - that if you're able to handle that then you should be able to handle the local locks using the same logic (defferring consistently).