I've gone and removed @version javadoc annotations from files containing
them.
On 08/04/2009 02:00 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
Yeah I agree. Lets not use $Id$ as they are pretty meaningless.
Any
meaningful info $Id$ exposes can be gleaned using svn log anyway.
On 4 Aug 2009, at 11:23, Galder Zamarreno wrote:
>
>
> On 08/04/2009 12:21 PM, Galder Zamarreno wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I see that Vladimir has started to use things like this in the javadoc
>> of some classes:
>>
>> @version $Id$
>>
>> In the past, I had loads of issues with this when trying to apply
>> patches because this information varies from commit to commit and hence
>> they cannot be matched :(
>
> And personally, I don't they add anything that cannot be retrieved with
> svn history...
>
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> --
> Galder ZamarreƱo
> Sr. Software Engineer
> Infinispan, JBoss Cache
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Manik Surtani
manik(a)jboss.org
Lead, Infinispan
Lead, JBoss Cache
http://www.infinispan.org
http://www.jbosscache.org
--
Galder ZamarreƱo
Sr. Software Engineer
Infinispan, JBoss Cache