Re: [infinispan-dev] [ISPN-78] Feedback needed

On 13 Apr 2011, at 19:26, Mircea Markus wrote: > IMO the large object methods would fit better in the Cache directly, vs AdvancedCache. Perhaps a new interface? StreamingCache?

> The way I see it AdvancedCache exposes to the power user internal ISPN stuff - stuff that's not generally needed by every day user. E.g. the interceptor chain, the rpc manager etc. > Everything that is plain API should be on the Cache itself, including lock() and withFlags() methods. Not really - I'd rather leave these as they are since they are considered advanced usage methods which require understanding of how Infinispan works internally. -- Manik Surtani manik(a)jboss.org twitter.com/maniksurtani Lead, Infinispan http://www.infinispan.org _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev