On 2 Feb 2011, at 13:51, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
On 11-02-02 10:41 AM, Mircea Markus wrote:
>> +1 I believe this can coexist/complement current setters approach. I do
>> not see how this can affect JAXB. It should work.
> you mean setXyzClass?
> I agree that this can coexist but I think the point is to simplify configuration so
I'd rather take these methods out (5 doesn't need to be backward compatible).
You would only leave this new API and remove the old setters? I guess we
can do that as well, did not even cross my mind, but maybe, why not?
the point of
this is to simplifying the config :)
Adding more setter on top of all the setters we have would just make things uglier imo.
(even with the very nice builder approach)