Re: [infinispan-dev] ISPN-118 - DefaultCacheManager already marked as MBean

FWIW, in management tools like JON/RHQ etc, its not really that much fun for Mbeans to suddenly disappear... often nicer to change some value on them and leave them around for the console/tools to deal with. On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 3:44 AM, Mircea Markus&lt;mircea.markus(a)jboss.com&gt; wrote: > > On Sep 10, 2009, at 6:27 PM, Galder Zamarreno wrote: > >> >> >> On 09/10/2009 04:42 PM, Mircea Markus wrote: >>> >>> On Sep 9, 2009, at 5:55 PM, Galder Zamarreno wrote: >>> >>>> </snip> >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>> Wouldn't it be simpler to only have one way of starting the cache >>> (through CM)? >> >> It would be simpler in the sense that there's only one way to start it >> but I'm not sure from an ease of use point of view. Let me explain. >> >> Let's say you wanna a cache called "galdercache" for the 1st time. >> You'd >> call DefaultCacheManager.start("galdercache"), correct? Now, let's say >> you stop it, so there's no trace of galdercache any more. How do you >> restart it? You have to go and call >> DefaultCacheManager.start("galdercache"). So now, to restart a cache, >> you have to type something and you have to remember the cache name you >> gave it to it. >> >> Wouldn't be easier, from an usability perspective, to go to >> galdercache >> MBean and call start() on the MBean directly? >> >> This is why I think keeping the MBean around would improve usability. > I see your point. After all, in an non-JMX world, one can do exactly > the same thing with a Cache.start *OR* CM.start. >> >>> IMO, after the cache is stopped the system should be in the same >>> state >>> as before starting it: no jmx registered. This would keep things >>> clearer. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 24 Jul 2009, at 09:55, Galder Zamarreno wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Re: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/ISPN-118 >>>>>> >>>>>> It turns out that since rev.454, DefaultCacheManager has already >>>>>> been >>>>>> marked as an MBean >>>>>> (http://fisheye.jboss.org/browse/Infinispan/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/i... >>>>>> ) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Currently, none of the getCache() methods are marked as MBean >>>>>> operations >>>>>> and I wanted to get confirmation on whether it should leave as it >>>>>> is. I >>>>>> mean, in AS6, I suppose people will be able to use the JNDI method >>>>>> to >>>>>> get access to the CacheManager and get the cache from there >>>>>> (http://tinyurl.com/lq688t section 11.2). Anyone running >>>>>> standalone can >>>>>> simply instantiate the cache manager. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thoughts? >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Galder Zamarreño >>>>>> Sr. Software Engineer >>>>>> Infinispan, JBoss Cache >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> infinispan-dev mailing list >>>>>> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Manik Surtani >>>>> manik(a)jboss.org >>>>> Lead, Infinispan >>>>> Lead, JBoss Cache >>>>> http://www.infinispan.org >>>>> http://www.jbosscache.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Galder Zamarreño >>>> Sr. Software Engineer >>>> Infinispan, JBoss Cache >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> infinispan-dev mailing list >>>> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> infinispan-dev mailing list >>> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev >> >> -- >> Galder Zamarreño >> Sr. Software Engineer >> Infinispan, JBoss Cache >> _______________________________________________ >> infinispan-dev mailing list >> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev >