+1
Dan
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Galder Zamarreno <galder(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Makes sense.
--
Galder ZamarreƱo
Infinispan, Red Hat
----- Original Message -----
> A recent issue with some refactoring of the PassivationInterceptor
> affecting code using it directly (EAP's Infinispan subsystem), has got
> me thinking about the fact that we have somewhat treated interceptors as
> a form of API since we do not provide another way of retrieving metrics
> collected by the interceptors, aside from the basic cache stats.
> With the plan to eventually drop interceptors, these kind of metrics
> should be exposed through a more stable API (aside from maintaining
> stability of the MBean side of things).
>
> The org.infinispan.stats.Stats interface already partially covers that
> for basic stats (see org.infinispan.cache.AdvancedCache.getStats()), and
> I think it should be extended or at least complemented to do this.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> Tristan
> --
> Tristan Tarrant
> Infinispan Lead
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev