2011/8/31 Manik Surtani <manik(a)jboss.org>:
On 31 Aug 2011, at 11:33, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
So I didn't have time to try reproducing this issue yet, and likely
won't for a week at least, but is it possible that the batching layer
- which we know is calling into the DummyTransactionManager - is
actually connecting my batch to the real TransactionManager ?
Yes, it should fall back to the real Transaction Manager if one is present.
However it should suspend any existing transactions and start a new one,
for the batch.
Thanks for the clarification. So where else could I look for this
strange behaviour?
I guess I'll need an in-container test to debug, but I wonder if I'll
be able to reproduce this if I don't know the possible cause.
Sanne