Mircea/Manik,
There's a final thing I'm not too happy about and that's the response to
the stats command. In the current form, the reply to a paramaterless stats
command that returns all stats available looks like this:
[header][name1 length][name1][value1 length][value1]
[header][name2 length][name2][value2 length][value2]
...
[header] -> This would be the end marker
This looks quite wasteful since we're adding a header per each stat.
Instead I suggest doing:
[header][number of stats][name1 length][name1][value1
length][value1][name2 length][name2][value2 length][value2]...
This is less wasteful and having the number of stats at the beginning
signals how much to read.
WDYT?
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:48:26 +0100, Galder Zamarreno <galder(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
Hi all,
After having yet another round of discussions, we consider the Hot Rod
protocol design at CR stage. Here's the final results:
http://community.jboss.org/wiki/HotRodProtocol
While me and Mircea are busy coding both the server and client, please
take some time to have a read through it and let us know what you think.
By the way, remember that we've deferred certain functionality for the
moment as indicated in a previous email:
[ISPN-375] Enable Hot Rod clients to start transactions [Open, Major,
Galder Zamarreno]
http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/ISPN-375
[ISPN-374] Add event handling to Hot Rod [Open, Major, Galder Zamarreno]
http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/ISPN-374
Cheers,
--
Galder ZamarreƱo
Sr. Software Engineer
Infinispan, JBoss Cache