On 14 Sep 2010, at 11:25, Galder ZamarreƱo wrote:
On Sep 13, 2010, at 11:06 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
>
> On 13 Sep 2010, at 19:26, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>
>> An important feature I'm missing when using batches but not using a
>> transaction manager is the capability to eagerly lock keys, because
>> there's no unlock.
>
> This applies to regular JTA transactions as well as batching, correct?
As a side note, this goes back, slightly, to my original question on batching.
Does batching (without a TM) make sense with eager locking?
batching always go with
a TM under the hood. If user doesn't specify one then BatchModeTransactionManager is
used (it implements DummyTM).
With JTA, we know locks are released at commit time thanks to multi
node coordination.
However, does multi node coordination happen when batching without TM is used? If not,
eager locking does not make sense with batching.
>
> --
> Manik Surtani
> manik(a)jboss.org
> Lead, Infinispan
> Lead, JBoss Cache
>
http://www.infinispan.org
>
http://www.jbosscache.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Galder ZamarreƱo
Sr. Software Engineer
Infinispan, JBoss Cache
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev