Re: [infinispan-dev] [ISPN-153] Binding Cache/CacheManager to JNDI

Hmm, I'm not sure about this - this adds bloat to Infinispan, and we shouldn't really care about how people share instances. However, it would make peoples' lives easier and increase adoption. What do others think? On 16 Oct 2009, at 12:29, Galder Zamarreno wrote: > Hi, > > Re: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/ISPN-153 > > Apart from testing itself, does it make sense to include the ability > of > binding to JNDI, using org.jboss.util.naming.NonSerializableFactory to > to bind a non-serializable object into a local JNDI context, within > Infinispan itself? > > So, I'm thinking that we could have a<jndi name="xyz"/> configuration > option both at the global level (for Cache Manager) and at the Cache > level. So, > > - if<jndi/> was present in the global section, we'd bind CacheManager > to java:CacheManager > > - if<jndi name="xyz"/> was present in the global section, we'd bind > CacheManager to java:xyz > > - if<jndi/> was present in the cache section, we'd bind Cache to > java:<name-of-the-cache> > > - if<jndi name="xyz"/> was present in the cache section, we'd bind > Cache to java:xyz > > This should, in theory, ease JNDI binding in AS and other apps servers > without the need of extra code in those environments. > > Thoughts? Brian, would you find this useful? > > Cheers, > -- > Galder Zamarreño > Sr. Software Engineer > Infinispan, JBoss Cache > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev -- Manik Surtani manik(a)jboss.org Lead, Infinispan Lead, JBoss Cache http://www.infinispan.org http://www.jbosscache.org _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev