On Feb 22, 2012, at 12:57 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
On 22 Feb 2012, at 09:46, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
> I thought I had made myself clear enough with the wiki and explanation on the email.
Let me try again:
>
> Imagine a near cache scenario:
>
> 1. Client A interacts with a near cache (i.e. embedded Infinispan with a remote cache
store) and stores V1 in key=k
> 2. Client B interacts with near cache and retrieves key=k. The req goes to server and
returns V1
> 3. Client B goes and updates key=k to V2
> 4. Client A receives a notification for key=k that it has been updated and it decides
to delete it from the near cache.
> 5. Client B receives a notification for key=k that it has been updated and it decides
to delete it from the near cache.
>
> Step 5. is suboptiomal because the update originiates at Client B.
>
> The idea of the "origin" is that the server could potentially be able to
tell client B that the notification is the result of an operation that started
'locally' and so client B could read that and decide to not delete it from the
near cache.
>
> Client A when it receieves the notification it realises that the notification is not
originated locally and can decide to delete the key from the near cache.
Client A and Client B are two threads in the same VM as the embedded cache with a remote
cache store?
Maybe, but not necessarily. It could very easily happen that Client A and Client B are
running on the same machine but in different VMs.
--
Manik Surtani
manik(a)jboss.org
twitter.com/maniksurtani
Lead, Infinispan
http://www.infinispan.org
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Galder Zamarreño
Sr. Software Engineer
Infinispan, JBoss Cache