Re: [infinispan-dev] benchmarking 5.1 vs 5.0

On Nov 28, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Mircea Markus wrote: > Hi, > > Now that all the 5.1 major work is done I plan to run some benchmarks comparing 5.1 with 5.0. It's not only tx stuff I'd like to compare, as some other were made, so here's my plan of action. > > Each of the following benchmarks will be run on local, distributed and replicated caches: > > 1. non transactional: web session replication[1] > 2. transactional (both optimistic and pessimistic): web session replication[2] > 3. transactional (both optimistic and pessimistic): tpcc [3] > > The difference between 2 and 3 is the fact that 3 induces some key contention between transactions. > > Any other suggestion for benchmarking? Could it be interesting to see what the autoCommit penalty is? i.e. comparing: non-transactional cache vs transactional cache with autoCommit