Re: [infinispan-dev] staggered_get Question

Hi Erik, could you elaborate on how "proximate" would look like please? I'm not understanding how X-Site is relating to this. Mircea, how is a secondary owner going to behave when setting MAIN_OWNER ?

-Sanne On 12 July 2013 17:21, Erik Salter <an1310(a)hotmail.com&gt; wrote: > - my boss and others. > > Why not proximate? I may only want to get data from the same machine/site > and retry if necessary. > > Erik > > -----Original Message----- > From: infinispan-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org > [mailto:infinispan-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Mircea Markus > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 11:56 AM > To: Hammad Said; infinispan -Dev List > Cc: Bryan Perrotti (bperrott); Erik Salter (esalter); Michael Walker; Balaji > Rajam > Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] staggered_get Question > > > On 12 Jul 2013, at 18:22, Mircea Markus <mmarkus(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> (Adding -dev) >> >> On 12 Jul 2013, at 05:04, Hammad Said <hsaid(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >>> I have implemented the change for address ordering in and created the > topic branch optimize_staggered-get in: >>> https://github.com/hsaid4327/infinispan.git >> >> which branch do you want me to look at? >> Or better can you please issue a pull request with your change? >> >>> >>> The next part is the configuration change. For the configuration change, > there are certain design decisions that need to be made: >>> a) We need to introduce two configuration params staggered_get_flag and > staggered_get_timeout. Where exactly are these params specified in the cache > configuration file. At the global or the cache level and under what element. > Are they be implemented as attributes of clustering element, separate > element as a child of clustering or cache. >> >> What about something like: >> <cluseter> >> <remoteReads policy="ALL|STAGGER|MAIN_OWNER" staggerTimeout="50"/> > > to clarify there are 3 ways of doing remote reads: all owners (like we > currently do), staggered (as discussed) and only to the main owner. > >> </cluster> >> >> What others think? >> >>> b) once we read the properties second big question is how to pass them on > to the dispatcher in question i.e CommandAwareRpcDispatacher. There are two > choices here: >>> 1- We change the method signature of invokeRemoteCommands and pass on > these two params. This choice involves making up the calling stack in the > classes that invoke this method namele JGroupsTransport and possible up the > calling stream. >>> 2- Another option is to set it on the ResponseFilter which is passed to > CommandAwareRpcDispatcher. >> >> I'm not sure the CARD needs to be aware of the staggering. I'd think it is > the responsibility of the caller (DistributionInterceptor) to orchestrate > staggering.. >> >>> >>> Also, would the changes in configuration would require making a change in > XSD schema file? >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Hammad >>> >>> >>> ` >> >> Cheers, >> -- >> Mircea Markus >> Infinispan lead (www.infinispan.org) >> >> >> >> > > Cheers, > -- > Mircea Markus > Infinispan lead (www.infinispan.org) > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev