On Jul 11, 2013, at 11:51 AM, Mircea Markus <mmarkus(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 11 Jul 2013, at 10:18, Galder Zamarreño <galder(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 9 Jul 2013, at 16:44, Sanne Grinovero <sanne(a)infinispan.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I would agree with you that this should be a priority, but keep in
>>> mind that just migrating data from a CacheStore to another won't be
>>> enough: as I pointed out in my previous mail, binary encoding also
>>> changed, making it impossible to deserialize the values.
>>
>> We should really see what has happened there Sanne, thanks for the heads up.
>> Ideally we should preserver backward compatibility for same store
implementations, or if we don't document it and provide the tooling for allow users to
upgrade. Galder something to look at together with the tooling for migrating data between
FCS impls perhaps?
>
> ^ That sounds very coarse grained to me. This kind of upgrade from a cache store to
another should be something we should cover in the rolling upgrades, and not as part of a
cache store specific migration kit, thoughts?
In Sanne's case it is from the same cache store between different infinispan
versions.
http://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3318
Cheers,
--
Mircea Markus
Infinispan lead (
www.infinispan.org)
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Galder Zamarreño
galder(a)redhat.com
twitter.com/galderz
Project Lead, Escalante
http://escalante.io
Engineer, Infinispan
http://infinispan.org