+1 for interchangeable apis
+1 for infinispan-api module
On 04/20/2017 05:06 PM, Tristan Tarrant wrote:
On 20/04/2017 15:34, Dan Berindei wrote:
>> How big is the DSL API surface (which will be brought into commons)?
> -1 from me to add anything in commons, I don't think allowing the
> users to query both embedded caches and remote caches with the same
> code is that important. I'd rather go the opposite way and remove the
> BasicCache interface completely.
Actually, we've had requests for interchangeable APIs...
So, according to your strategy we either have each feature implemented
with a divergent specific embedded or remote API, or each feature has
its own feature-api with two separate feature-embedded and
feature-remote implementations. Both plans sound terrible.
Alternatively, we could go with an infinispan-api package (which Paul
has been advocating for a long time) which would contain the various
interfaces.
Tristan