From the perspective of liking to control things, I agree on the
callback
version. The callback implementation also seems like it will be much
easier to implement and maintain as well :) Guessing we can put everything
in SecureCache as well then.
- Will
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 8:26 AM Dan Berindei <dan.berindei(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Unless there is a big push for ACLs from users, I think we should
stick to the callback version.
Cheers
Dan
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Tristan Tarrant <ttarrant(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I've created a wiki entry for fine-grained authorization. Please look at
it:
>
>
https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/wiki/Fine-grained-security-for-c...
>
> And let me know your thoughts. Personally I'm not sure the second case
> is worth the effort, but it definitely has its advantages.
>
> Tristan
> --
> Tristan Tarrant
> Infinispan Lead
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev